Recently in trends Category
The New York Times ran an article this week describing how old school speakeasys are having a resurgence, with no other purpose other than nostalgia.
On a nondescript block in Williamsburg, not far from the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, a new bar and restaurant called Rye opened last week.Try to find it.
There's no sign out front. The facade, an artfully casual assemblage of old wooden slats, gives the place a boarded-up, abandoned look. It does have a street number, painted discreetly on a glass panel above the front doors, but that's it. Like a suspect in a lineup, it seems to shrink back when observed.

According to William Gurstelle, author of Absinthe and Flamethrowers: Projects and Ruminations on the Art of Living Dangerously, says the most satisfied and successful third of the population is eager for some risky business.
From his guest post on Boing Boing:
I found that moderate, rational, risk takers, that is, those with scores between the mean and one standard deviation to the right are the people who are most satisfied with their lives. I call that area "the golden third" because it's roughly 1/3 of the population. Studies (and there are several) show that people who take just a bit more risks than average, that is, those who live their lives in the golden third, tend to do better than average. They tend to be more satisfied with their lives and more fulfilled. To me, that's a stunning conclusion.
So in the spirit of risk-taking, something old and something new:
Downhill longboarding (at insane speeds) [go to 2:20] and a flip-tastic new free walking highlight reel.
In the late '90s, activist, provocateur, and aging hippy John Barlow began calling this drift [toward digital socialism], somewhat tongue in cheek, "dot-communism." He defined it as a "workforce composed entirely of free agents," a decentralized gift or barter economy where there is no property and where technological architecture defines the political space. He was right on the virtual money. But there is one way in which socialism is the wrong word for what is happening: It is not an ideology. It demands no rigid creed. Rather, [the digital revolution] is a spectrum of attitudes, techniques, and tools that promote collaboration, sharing, aggregation, coordination, ad hocracy, and a host of other newly enabled types of social cooperation. It is a design frontier and a particularly fertile space for innovation.
NYT: Wired is ad-starved and propped up by Conde Nast; online readers vastly outnumber subscription readers.
Innovation in online media business models would help right about now. Can we aggregate that?







